Review



bulk tags  (Xenocs Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Xenocs Inc is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Xenocs Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 99
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Xenocs Inc bulk tags
    Bulk Tags, supplied by Xenocs Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 4062 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/bulk tags/product/Xenocs Inc
    Average 99 stars, based on 4062 article reviews
    bulk tags - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    99/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    bulk cut t ag  (EpiCypher)
    96
    EpiCypher bulk cut t ag
    (A) Top, illustration of the part of the brain used for all experiments, labeled “non-visual brain”. Bottom, number of biological replicates of brains profiled using RNA-seq, Micro-C, ATAC-seq, <t>or</t> <t>CUT&Tag</t> for H3K4me3, H3K4me1, H3K27ac, H3K36me3, H3K9me3, H3K27me3, H2AK119ub, or for IgG control. (B) Micro-C contact maps for the whole-genome scale (left) and for portions of scaffold 15 ( Hsal 9.0) at increasing resolutions (res). The matrices are shown as KR-normalized, balanced contact frequencies. (C) Size in millions of base pairs for the longest 25 scaffolds (red colors) in comparison to all other scaffolds (white) in assembly version v1.0 , v8.6 , and v9.0 (this study). (D) Number of scaffolds in assembly version v1.0 , v8.6 , and v9.0 (current version). (E) ATAC, H3K27ac, H3K4me1, and H3K27me3 signal at enhancers (center ± 5 kb). Enhancers were classified into active, bivalent, primed, and poised based on their accessibility and histone marks in worker brains. The y axis represents raw counts per million (CPM) for ATAC, or scaled, IgG-normalized CPM (for CUT&Tag, see methods). (F) Comparison of assignments of enhancers to target genes using Micro-C and with proximity assignment method. Numbers of active, bivalent, primed, and poised enhancers (as defined by their chromatin state in worker brains) for which gene target assignment using Micro-C and proximity coincided (“match with proximal”), matched to multiple promoters including the proximal promoter, or matched to distal promoters. The number of biological replicates for all analyses is shown in panel (A).
    Bulk Cut T Ag, supplied by EpiCypher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/bulk cut t ag/product/EpiCypher
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    bulk cut t ag - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    bulk tags  (Xenocs Inc)
    99
    Xenocs Inc bulk tags
    (A) Top, illustration of the part of the brain used for all experiments, labeled “non-visual brain”. Bottom, number of biological replicates of brains profiled using RNA-seq, Micro-C, ATAC-seq, <t>or</t> <t>CUT&Tag</t> for H3K4me3, H3K4me1, H3K27ac, H3K36me3, H3K9me3, H3K27me3, H2AK119ub, or for IgG control. (B) Micro-C contact maps for the whole-genome scale (left) and for portions of scaffold 15 ( Hsal 9.0) at increasing resolutions (res). The matrices are shown as KR-normalized, balanced contact frequencies. (C) Size in millions of base pairs for the longest 25 scaffolds (red colors) in comparison to all other scaffolds (white) in assembly version v1.0 , v8.6 , and v9.0 (this study). (D) Number of scaffolds in assembly version v1.0 , v8.6 , and v9.0 (current version). (E) ATAC, H3K27ac, H3K4me1, and H3K27me3 signal at enhancers (center ± 5 kb). Enhancers were classified into active, bivalent, primed, and poised based on their accessibility and histone marks in worker brains. The y axis represents raw counts per million (CPM) for ATAC, or scaled, IgG-normalized CPM (for CUT&Tag, see methods). (F) Comparison of assignments of enhancers to target genes using Micro-C and with proximity assignment method. Numbers of active, bivalent, primed, and poised enhancers (as defined by their chromatin state in worker brains) for which gene target assignment using Micro-C and proximity coincided (“match with proximal”), matched to multiple promoters including the proximal promoter, or matched to distal promoters. The number of biological replicates for all analyses is shown in panel (A).
    Bulk Tags, supplied by Xenocs Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/bulk tags/product/Xenocs Inc
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    bulk tags - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    99/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    sequence tags and segregating snps for bulk segregants generated on illumina gaiix  (Illumina Inc)
    90
    Illumina Inc sequence tags and segregating snps for bulk segregants generated on illumina gaiix
    (A) Top, illustration of the part of the brain used for all experiments, labeled “non-visual brain”. Bottom, number of biological replicates of brains profiled using RNA-seq, Micro-C, ATAC-seq, <t>or</t> <t>CUT&Tag</t> for H3K4me3, H3K4me1, H3K27ac, H3K36me3, H3K9me3, H3K27me3, H2AK119ub, or for IgG control. (B) Micro-C contact maps for the whole-genome scale (left) and for portions of scaffold 15 ( Hsal 9.0) at increasing resolutions (res). The matrices are shown as KR-normalized, balanced contact frequencies. (C) Size in millions of base pairs for the longest 25 scaffolds (red colors) in comparison to all other scaffolds (white) in assembly version v1.0 , v8.6 , and v9.0 (this study). (D) Number of scaffolds in assembly version v1.0 , v8.6 , and v9.0 (current version). (E) ATAC, H3K27ac, H3K4me1, and H3K27me3 signal at enhancers (center ± 5 kb). Enhancers were classified into active, bivalent, primed, and poised based on their accessibility and histone marks in worker brains. The y axis represents raw counts per million (CPM) for ATAC, or scaled, IgG-normalized CPM (for CUT&Tag, see methods). (F) Comparison of assignments of enhancers to target genes using Micro-C and with proximity assignment method. Numbers of active, bivalent, primed, and poised enhancers (as defined by their chromatin state in worker brains) for which gene target assignment using Micro-C and proximity coincided (“match with proximal”), matched to multiple promoters including the proximal promoter, or matched to distal promoters. The number of biological replicates for all analyses is shown in panel (A).
    Sequence Tags And Segregating Snps For Bulk Segregants Generated On Illumina Gaiix, supplied by Illumina Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/sequence tags and segregating snps for bulk segregants generated on illumina gaiix/product/Illumina Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    sequence tags and segregating snps for bulk segregants generated on illumina gaiix - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    (A) Top, illustration of the part of the brain used for all experiments, labeled “non-visual brain”. Bottom, number of biological replicates of brains profiled using RNA-seq, Micro-C, ATAC-seq, or CUT&Tag for H3K4me3, H3K4me1, H3K27ac, H3K36me3, H3K9me3, H3K27me3, H2AK119ub, or for IgG control. (B) Micro-C contact maps for the whole-genome scale (left) and for portions of scaffold 15 ( Hsal 9.0) at increasing resolutions (res). The matrices are shown as KR-normalized, balanced contact frequencies. (C) Size in millions of base pairs for the longest 25 scaffolds (red colors) in comparison to all other scaffolds (white) in assembly version v1.0 , v8.6 , and v9.0 (this study). (D) Number of scaffolds in assembly version v1.0 , v8.6 , and v9.0 (current version). (E) ATAC, H3K27ac, H3K4me1, and H3K27me3 signal at enhancers (center ± 5 kb). Enhancers were classified into active, bivalent, primed, and poised based on their accessibility and histone marks in worker brains. The y axis represents raw counts per million (CPM) for ATAC, or scaled, IgG-normalized CPM (for CUT&Tag, see methods). (F) Comparison of assignments of enhancers to target genes using Micro-C and with proximity assignment method. Numbers of active, bivalent, primed, and poised enhancers (as defined by their chromatin state in worker brains) for which gene target assignment using Micro-C and proximity coincided (“match with proximal”), matched to multiple promoters including the proximal promoter, or matched to distal promoters. The number of biological replicates for all analyses is shown in panel (A).

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Socially regulated genes are spatially hyperconnected to enhancers in the ant brain

    doi: 10.64898/2026.04.08.717219

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Top, illustration of the part of the brain used for all experiments, labeled “non-visual brain”. Bottom, number of biological replicates of brains profiled using RNA-seq, Micro-C, ATAC-seq, or CUT&Tag for H3K4me3, H3K4me1, H3K27ac, H3K36me3, H3K9me3, H3K27me3, H2AK119ub, or for IgG control. (B) Micro-C contact maps for the whole-genome scale (left) and for portions of scaffold 15 ( Hsal 9.0) at increasing resolutions (res). The matrices are shown as KR-normalized, balanced contact frequencies. (C) Size in millions of base pairs for the longest 25 scaffolds (red colors) in comparison to all other scaffolds (white) in assembly version v1.0 , v8.6 , and v9.0 (this study). (D) Number of scaffolds in assembly version v1.0 , v8.6 , and v9.0 (current version). (E) ATAC, H3K27ac, H3K4me1, and H3K27me3 signal at enhancers (center ± 5 kb). Enhancers were classified into active, bivalent, primed, and poised based on their accessibility and histone marks in worker brains. The y axis represents raw counts per million (CPM) for ATAC, or scaled, IgG-normalized CPM (for CUT&Tag, see methods). (F) Comparison of assignments of enhancers to target genes using Micro-C and with proximity assignment method. Numbers of active, bivalent, primed, and poised enhancers (as defined by their chromatin state in worker brains) for which gene target assignment using Micro-C and proximity coincided (“match with proximal”), matched to multiple promoters including the proximal promoter, or matched to distal promoters. The number of biological replicates for all analyses is shown in panel (A).

    Article Snippet: Antibodies used for bulk CUT&Tag were as listed and diluted according to manufacturer’s recommendations: H3K27me3 (rabbit, Epicypher, 13-0055), H3K27me3 rabbit, Cell Signaling, C36B11), H3K4me3 (rabbit, Epicypher, 13-0041), H3K4me3 (rabbit, Abcam, ab213224), H3K4me1 (rabbit, Abcam, ab8895), H3K27ac (rabbit, Abcam, ab4729), H3K9me3 (rabbit, Abcam, ab8898), H2AK119ub1, (rabbit, Cell Signaling, D27C4), H3K36me3, (rabbit, Abcam, Ab9050), Rabbit IgG (secondary antibody, guinea pig, antibodies-online, ABIN101961), IgG (negative control, rabbit, Epicypher, 13-0042).

    Techniques: Labeling, RNA Sequencing, Control, Comparison

    (A) Micro-C and chromatin enrichment across a 1 Mb region on scaffold 49. Chromatin interactions are visualized as balanced, Knight-Ruiz (KR)-normalized contact frequencies. TAD boundaries at different resolutions were identified by insulation score. RNA-seq, ATAC-seq and CUT&Tag signal for H3K4me3, H3K27ac, H3K4me1, H3K27me3 are shown in CPM along with annotated genes. (B) Percentage of TAD boundaries overlapping with promoter (± 1 kb from the TSS), exonic, intronic, and intergenic regions. (C) ATAC-seq (CPM) and CUT&Tag signal (H3K4me3, H3K27ac, H3K4me1, H3K27me3, H2AK119ub, and H3K9me3, normalized with scaled IgG) enrichment at all TAD boundaries. (D) Motif enrichment at TAD boundaries overlapping with promoter, genic, or intergenic regions in Harpegnathos or Drosophila , identified by SEA-based analysis using shuffled sequences preserving dinucleotide frequencies as the background.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Socially regulated genes are spatially hyperconnected to enhancers in the ant brain

    doi: 10.64898/2026.04.08.717219

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Micro-C and chromatin enrichment across a 1 Mb region on scaffold 49. Chromatin interactions are visualized as balanced, Knight-Ruiz (KR)-normalized contact frequencies. TAD boundaries at different resolutions were identified by insulation score. RNA-seq, ATAC-seq and CUT&Tag signal for H3K4me3, H3K27ac, H3K4me1, H3K27me3 are shown in CPM along with annotated genes. (B) Percentage of TAD boundaries overlapping with promoter (± 1 kb from the TSS), exonic, intronic, and intergenic regions. (C) ATAC-seq (CPM) and CUT&Tag signal (H3K4me3, H3K27ac, H3K4me1, H3K27me3, H2AK119ub, and H3K9me3, normalized with scaled IgG) enrichment at all TAD boundaries. (D) Motif enrichment at TAD boundaries overlapping with promoter, genic, or intergenic regions in Harpegnathos or Drosophila , identified by SEA-based analysis using shuffled sequences preserving dinucleotide frequencies as the background.

    Article Snippet: Antibodies used for bulk CUT&Tag were as listed and diluted according to manufacturer’s recommendations: H3K27me3 (rabbit, Epicypher, 13-0055), H3K27me3 rabbit, Cell Signaling, C36B11), H3K4me3 (rabbit, Epicypher, 13-0041), H3K4me3 (rabbit, Abcam, ab213224), H3K4me1 (rabbit, Abcam, ab8895), H3K27ac (rabbit, Abcam, ab4729), H3K9me3 (rabbit, Abcam, ab8898), H2AK119ub1, (rabbit, Cell Signaling, D27C4), H3K36me3, (rabbit, Abcam, Ab9050), Rabbit IgG (secondary antibody, guinea pig, antibodies-online, ABIN101961), IgG (negative control, rabbit, Epicypher, 13-0042).

    Techniques: Insulation, RNA Sequencing, Preserving

    (A) K-means clustering of 4,608 TADs into 6 classes, annotated based on their chromatin enrichment. Each row represents a TAD. (B) Percentage of the genome covered by each TAD class. (C) Size distribution of each TAD class. (D) Percentage of chromatin loops classified as promoter–promoter (P–P), enhancer–promoter (E–P), promoter–gene body (P–GB), enhancer–gene body (E–GB), gene body–gene body (GB–GB), or “undefined”, indicating that at least one of the two anchors maps to an intergenic region devoid of enhancers. (E) Distribution of anchor distance in kb for each class of chromatin loop. (F) Motif enrichment at all loop anchors against a shuffled background (left column), at all promoters with loops against promoters without loops (middle column), or promoters with loops and marked by H3K4me3 against promoters with loops but devoid of H3K4me3 (right column). Preferential tissue expression is indicated on the left (see also Fig. S5C). (G) Distribution of genome-wide normalized interaction frequency against distance. Red dots show identified meta-loops; light and dark gray curves show 1st–99th or 25th–75th percentile ranges of all contact pairs, respectively; black line shows the median. (H) An example meta-domain formed by two TADs comprising Eip98C (horizontal) and Eip78C (vertical) connected by three meta-loops, anchored at sites indicated by red blocks at the margins of the interaction matrix. The Micro-C contact frequencies, KR-normalized and balanced are shown in the center matrix; insulation score, ATAC-seq, and CUT&Tag signal for H3K4me3, H3K27me3, H3K27ac are plotted along the margins for the two loci.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Socially regulated genes are spatially hyperconnected to enhancers in the ant brain

    doi: 10.64898/2026.04.08.717219

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) K-means clustering of 4,608 TADs into 6 classes, annotated based on their chromatin enrichment. Each row represents a TAD. (B) Percentage of the genome covered by each TAD class. (C) Size distribution of each TAD class. (D) Percentage of chromatin loops classified as promoter–promoter (P–P), enhancer–promoter (E–P), promoter–gene body (P–GB), enhancer–gene body (E–GB), gene body–gene body (GB–GB), or “undefined”, indicating that at least one of the two anchors maps to an intergenic region devoid of enhancers. (E) Distribution of anchor distance in kb for each class of chromatin loop. (F) Motif enrichment at all loop anchors against a shuffled background (left column), at all promoters with loops against promoters without loops (middle column), or promoters with loops and marked by H3K4me3 against promoters with loops but devoid of H3K4me3 (right column). Preferential tissue expression is indicated on the left (see also Fig. S5C). (G) Distribution of genome-wide normalized interaction frequency against distance. Red dots show identified meta-loops; light and dark gray curves show 1st–99th or 25th–75th percentile ranges of all contact pairs, respectively; black line shows the median. (H) An example meta-domain formed by two TADs comprising Eip98C (horizontal) and Eip78C (vertical) connected by three meta-loops, anchored at sites indicated by red blocks at the margins of the interaction matrix. The Micro-C contact frequencies, KR-normalized and balanced are shown in the center matrix; insulation score, ATAC-seq, and CUT&Tag signal for H3K4me3, H3K27me3, H3K27ac are plotted along the margins for the two loci.

    Article Snippet: Antibodies used for bulk CUT&Tag were as listed and diluted according to manufacturer’s recommendations: H3K27me3 (rabbit, Epicypher, 13-0055), H3K27me3 rabbit, Cell Signaling, C36B11), H3K4me3 (rabbit, Epicypher, 13-0041), H3K4me3 (rabbit, Abcam, ab213224), H3K4me1 (rabbit, Abcam, ab8895), H3K27ac (rabbit, Abcam, ab4729), H3K9me3 (rabbit, Abcam, ab8898), H2AK119ub1, (rabbit, Cell Signaling, D27C4), H3K36me3, (rabbit, Abcam, Ab9050), Rabbit IgG (secondary antibody, guinea pig, antibodies-online, ABIN101961), IgG (negative control, rabbit, Epicypher, 13-0042).

    Techniques: Expressing, Genome Wide, Insulation